NOTE: VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE.
In a bombshell interview aired on Sean Spicer’s program, Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz claimed he has seen the full Jeffrey Epstein “client list” and suggested the document is being deliberately kept from the public to shield certain high-profile individuals.
“Documents are being suppressed to protect individuals,” Dershowitz stated. “I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them. But I’m bound by confidentiality.”
His remarks come at a time when renewed attention is being paid to Epstein’s associations and alleged network of elite clientele. Just a day before Dershowitz’s appearance, both the FBI and Department of Justice issued a memo denying that any official “client list” tied to Epstein exists. The agencies concluded there was no concrete evidence Epstein kept a list of clients, nor any proof that he was blackmailing powerful figures.
The memo, which was reportedly the result of an internal probe, reaffirmed the government’s long-standing position that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking of minors.
Still, Dershowitz’s statements challenge that narrative and are reigniting questions many Americans have had for years: Who were Epstein’s clients? And why hasn’t the full truth been disclosed?
The White House was pressed on the matter during a briefing earlier this week. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to questions about the so-called client list that Attorney General Pam Bondi previously said was on her desk. Leavitt stood by the DOJ and FBI, emphasizing that the Trump administration is committed to pursuing justice “without fear or favor.”
She also addressed the confusion over Bondi’s prior statement, clarifying that when Bondi referenced the documents “on her desk,” she was referring to the full trove of case files connected to Epstein—not specifically to a client list.
Leavitt explained that portions of the Epstein materials have not been released due to their extremely graphic content, including explicit material involving minors. “The materials that have not been released contain incredibly graphic child pornography, not appropriate for public consumption,” she said, echoing earlier statements from law enforcement officials.
During the same exchange, Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked Leavitt if Bondi’s desk comment implied the existence of a verified list of clients. Leavitt reiterated that the administration remains focused on the broader goal: holding perpetrators accountable and uncovering the full extent of Epstein’s criminal network.
Despite repeated denials from federal agencies, Dershowitz’s claims have added a new layer of intrigue to the already complex Epstein saga. While no names were shared publicly, his assertion that he knows who’s being protected is likely to fuel even more speculation—and intensify calls for transparency.
As the debate rages on, one thing remains clear: the Epstein case is far from over.
The public deserves answers—and accountability. Until full transparency is achieved, speculation will only grow and trust in our institutions will continue to erode.
PLAY:
