NOTE: VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE.
A fiery debate over Donald Trump’s legacy reignited this week after Fox News host Will Cain boldly suggested that the former president deserves a spot on Mount Rushmore—citing his diplomatic achievements in the Middle East as a defining aspect of his presidency.
During a recent segment of The Will Cain Show, the Fox personality applauded Trump’s role in brokering peace agreements in one of the world’s most volatile regions. Cain’s praise centered on Trump’s continued efforts to stabilize relations between long-time adversaries, including a recent—though fragile—ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
“Despite doubts and two nations set on conflict, he has once again brought peace to the Middle East,” Cain declared. “That kind of leadership is Mount Rushmore-level. Whether you like him or not, the results speak for themselves.”
Cain’s remarks immediately sparked backlash from critics who accuse the commentator of exaggerating Trump’s accomplishments and ignoring the complex—and often temporary—nature of Middle Eastern peace deals.
At the heart of Cain’s praise lies Trump’s record on foreign diplomacy, especially the Abraham Accords, a landmark initiative that saw Israel normalize relations with several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco. The agreements, brokered during Trump’s first term, were widely viewed as a breakthrough in regional diplomacy and earned praise from international leaders and policy experts.
But not everyone agrees with Cain’s glowing assessment.
While the Abraham Accords represented a significant step forward, critics argue that many of Trump’s efforts lacked the lasting impact necessary to reshape the geopolitical landscape. For example, the ceasefire Cain referenced between Israel and Iran—hailed by supporters as another Trump-led diplomatic triumph—was reportedly violated within weeks, raising doubts about its effectiveness and durability.
“This isn’t the first time Trump has taken a headline victory lap only to have the results unravel shortly after,” said one former State Department official. “Peace in the Middle East requires more than handshake photo-ops and momentary agreements.”
Still, supporters like Cain maintain that Trump’s approach—one grounded in boldness and unconventional tactics—achieved tangible results where others failed. By emphasizing strength and direct negotiation, Trump sidestepped traditional diplomacy to produce historic agreements in a region plagued by decades of hostility.
Cain’s “Mount Rushmore” remark has become a lightning rod on social media, with hashtags like #MountTrump and #MiddleEastPeace trending across platforms. Supporters hailed the idea as long overdue, while opponents called it absurd political fan fiction.
The renewed focus on Trump’s international record comes at a politically pivotal time, as the former president continues to dominate GOP polling and prepare for a potential return to the White House. Whether or not Cain’s endorsement influences public opinion, it has undeniably reignited one of the most contentious questions in American politics: What will Donald Trump’s legacy truly be?
For now, the debate continues—etched not in stone, but in headlines, hashtags, and partisan passions.
PLAY:
