Recent reports have surfaced alleging that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a wide-ranging investigation into what is described as a decade-long Democratic “election interference” operation. According to the July 14, 2025 article by Just the News, the FBI has quietly opened a probe examining actions by Democratic Party operatives and members of the intelligence community that span multiple U.S. election cycles, including the controversial Russia collusion narrative and Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations.
The report claims this investigation, dubbed the “grand conspiracy” probe, began several weeks ago following the appointment of FBI Director Kash Patel. It suggests the probe could intensify if former President Donald Trump declassifies two batches of classified documents, which sources say may reveal a coordinated effort dating back to the summer of 2016 to influence elections in favor of Democrats and against Trump.
Central to this narrative are two sets of classified evidence. The first allegedly involves a classified annex from an inspector general’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, reportedly requested by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley. This document is said to show that the FBI deliberately ignored credible allegations of misconduct. The second tranche, referred to as “Clinton plan intelligence,” stems from Special Counsel John Durham’s report on the Russia investigation. It allegedly reveals that U.S. intelligence agencies were aware the Clinton campaign had devised a plan to fabricate the Russia collusion narrative to undermine Trump’s 2016 presidential bid, prior to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
The report further includes claims made by former CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who sharply criticized the intelligence community’s handling of Russian interference claims. Ratcliffe accused his predecessor, John Brennan, of prioritizing “narrative consistency over analytical soundness” by endorsing the inclusion of the controversial Steele dossier in intelligence assessments. Ratcliffe also labeled the campaign against Trump an “atypical and corrupt process” driven by political bias.
In addition to these allegations, the article mentions intelligence reportedly provided to the FBI regarding Chinese efforts to interfere in the 2020 election. This intelligence purportedly involved a scheme to produce fake U.S. driver’s licenses aimed at enabling fraudulent mail-in ballots to benefit Joe Biden. According to the report, the FBI failed to pursue this lead and allegedly instructed other intelligence agencies to destroy related material. The statute of limitations for potential criminal charges connected to this alleged interference is said to be rapidly approaching.
However, the broader claim of a comprehensive DOJ investigation into a decade-long Democratic “election interference” operation remains unconfirmed by mainstream or independent news organizations. While some conservative outlets have reported on such a probe, there is no official confirmation from the DOJ or corroboration from multiple reputable sources. The allegations contained in these reports are politically charged and have not been independently verified.
At present, no official statements from the DOJ or FBI confirm the existence of this sweeping investigation. Readers are advised to approach such claims with caution and to seek information from multiple credible sources. As new information emerges, it will be essential to monitor official channels and well-established media outlets for verification or refutation of these serious allegations.
