Controversial Meme Case Takes Stunning Turn in Federal Court

NOTE: VIDEO AT THE END OF ARTICLE

Federal Court Tosses Meme Creator’s Conviction in Major Free Speech Case

A federal appeals court has overturned the conviction of Douglass Mackey, the man behind the “Ricky Vaughn” account, who had been sentenced to seven months in prison for sharing a satirical meme during the 2016 election. The unanimous decision from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marks a key moment in the ongoing debate over political speech and internet censorship.

In a ruling released Tuesday, the court found that the government failed to prove Mackey had knowingly conspired to suppress votes. The Biden administration had charged Mackey under 18 U.S.C. § 241—a law historically associated with violent voter suppression during the Jim Crow era.

The meme in question encouraged Hillary Clinton supporters to “Vote from Home” by texting “Hillary” to a fake number. According to trial evidence, around 5,000 people interacted with the post, but most received an automated message clarifying that the text was not affiliated with the Clinton campaign.

Despite this, the Department of Justice claimed Mackey’s meme was a form of election interference. They argued that Mackey worked with others online to spread similar content designed to mislead voters. However, the appeals panel disagreed.

In the decision, the judges—appointed by both Democrat and Republican presidents—ruled that there was no evidence Mackey entered into any criminal agreement or that anyone was actually prevented from voting. “No evidence at trial showed that Mackey’s tweets actually misled anyone into improperly casting their vote,” the ruling stated.

Legal analysts say the court’s stance may limit future efforts to prosecute online satire and misinformation under federal conspiracy statutes. “This sets a powerful precedent for First Amendment protections in the digital age,” said attorney David French, a longtime constitutional law expert.

Following the ruling, Mackey took to X (formerly Twitter) to share the news:

“BREAKING: THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS THROWN OUT MY CONVICTION FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE… HALLELUJAH!”

He continued, “Praise God. God is good,” thanking his legal team and followers:

“To my wife, my attorney Andrew Frisch, the team at Jones Day, and every single person who stood by me: thank you.”

Mackey also hinted at future legal action against those involved in the prosecution:

“Now we sue.”

The case had become a rallying point for critics of the Biden DOJ, who claimed the administration was using law enforcement to target political speech online. With the ruling now in place, many view it as a major blow to overreach and a win for free expression—no matter how controversial.

Key Takeaway:

The court’s decision reinforces that bad memes, even if misleading, aren’t criminal—unless they’re part of an actual conspiracy. In Mackey’s case, that threshold wasn’t met.

Biden’s Final Pardons Under Investigation After Autopen Disclosure

Bongino, Bondi, and the Epstein Files: Trump Responds Amid DOJ Rumors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *