NOTE: VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is pushing back hard against CNN after the network published claims that recent U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were largely ineffective. But the controversy goes far beyond media spin — according to Hegseth, the Pentagon and FBI have launched an internal investigation into whether CNN’s reporting included leaked classified information about highly sensitive military operations.
The network’s report, which cited unnamed sources, suggested that the strikes failed to deliver a major setback to Tehran’s nuclear program — a narrative Hegseth categorically rejected. In a statement to reporters, the Defense Secretary emphasized that the operation had “achieved key strategic objectives” and warned that public speculation about military effectiveness based on incomplete or leaked information undermines national security.
What has alarmed officials most, however, is the possibility that CNN’s sources disclosed classified material regarding the timing, targeting, and outcomes of the coordinated attacks. Hegseth confirmed that the Pentagon has already initiated a formal review to determine whether sensitive details were unlawfully shared with the press, and the FBI is reportedly involved in tracking the source of the leaks.
“If it turns out that classified strike assessments or operational details were leaked for political or media gain, we’re looking at a serious breach of national security,” Hegseth said. “This goes beyond journalism — it’s a potential criminal matter.”
Sources within the intelligence community have expressed concern that adversaries like Iran and Russia may exploit this leaked information to adjust their defenses, reroute assets, or even retaliate. Some lawmakers are already calling for congressional oversight hearings to examine the extent of the damage and whether CNN should face consequences for publishing potentially classified content.
CNN has stood by its reporting but has not publicly addressed the leak allegations. The network maintains that its story was based on “multiple senior sources with direct knowledge” of the operation’s outcomes. Meanwhile, critics are accusing the outlet of prioritizing political messaging over national security, with some suggesting the story was designed to embarrass the Biden administration’s foreign policy team in the wake of escalating Middle East tensions.
The controversy comes amid broader concerns about media access to classified intelligence and the growing number of national security leaks in recent years. As the investigation unfolds, officials are warning members of the press and government insiders alike that unauthorized disclosures of military operations put American lives and missions at risk.
The outcome of the investigation could have major implications not just for the press and the Pentagon, but for how classified information is handled — and potentially mishandled — in an era of 24/7 news cycles and political warfare.
PLAY:
