A sweeping personnel shakeup inside the Federal Bureau of Investigation is continuing to send shockwaves through the agency, as FBI Director Kash Patel has dismissed a new group of senior officials and agents connected to investigations involving President Donald Trump.
The latest firings mark another significant step in a broader reorganization effort that began shortly after Patel’s confirmation as director in early 2025. While the FBI has not released a formal accounting of those removed, multiple reports indicate that the dismissals disproportionately affect individuals who played roles in high-profile Trump-related probes, including the January 6 Capitol investigation and the classified documents case centered on Mar-a-Lago.
According to reporting from MS NOW, the most recent round of terminations targeted senior leadership across several key field offices, signaling a shift not only in personnel but also in institutional priorities at the bureau.
Senior Field Office Leadership Removed
Among the most notable dismissals was the special agent in charge of the FBI’s Atlanta field office. While the bureau has not publicly detailed the agent’s specific involvement in Trump-related cases, the Atlanta office played a role in election-related investigations in Georgia, a focal point of legal and political battles following the 2020 election.
The removal of an SAC is a rare and consequential move, as these officials oversee some of the bureau’s largest and most influential regional operations. The Atlanta office, in particular, has jurisdiction over complex public corruption, election integrity, and national security matters.
In addition, the acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office was dismissed. The New York office has long been one of the FBI’s most powerful divisions, handling major financial crimes, counterintelligence operations, and politically sensitive investigations. It has also been linked to aspects of prior inquiries involving Trump and his business dealings.
A former special agent in charge from the New Orleans field office was also terminated. Although that individual had since transitioned into a different role within the bureau, their earlier leadership position placed them within the FBI’s senior ranks during a period when Trump-related investigations were expanding nationwide.
Miami Agents Linked to Mar-a-Lago Search Fired
Perhaps the most direct connection to a specific Trump investigation involves the Miami field office. Reports indicate that up to six agents were fired due to their involvement in the controversial 2022 search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
That operation, which drew intense political backlash and legal scrutiny, was led by the Miami office and became a defining moment in public debates over the FBI’s independence and use of authority. The firings represent the clearest example yet of personnel consequences tied to that event.
Critics of the search have long argued it symbolized an overreach by federal law enforcement, while defenders maintained it was legally justified. Patel’s decision to remove agents associated with the operation suggests a reassessment of that episode at the highest levels of the bureau.
A Pattern That Began in 2025
The latest dismissals are not isolated. They follow a series of staffing changes that began soon after Patel assumed leadership of the FBI. Throughout 2025, the bureau experienced repeated cycles of firings, reinstatements, and subsequent removals, particularly involving agents connected to Trump-related cases.
In November, several agents assigned to Trump investigations were fired, briefly rehired, and then fired again. Among them was an agent responsible for managing the FBI’s jet fleet — a role not directly tied to investigative work but swept up in broader personnel reviews.
The unusual sequence raised questions about internal decision-making processes and highlighted the turbulence within the agency as new leadership moved to assert control.
Fallout From the Jack Smith Probe
Earlier, in October 2025, agents who worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump were dismissed following disclosures that the team had obtained phone records belonging to members of Congress. That revelation sparked outrage among Republican lawmakers and renewed allegations of institutional overreach.
Those firings were seen as a turning point, signaling that Patel was willing to take aggressive action against agents involved in politically sensitive investigations, even when those probes had been approved under prior leadership.
George Floyd Protest Firings Add Complexity
Not all of the personnel changes were directly tied to Trump. In September 2025, approximately a dozen FBI agents were fired for actions taken during protests following the death of George Floyd in 2020. Those agents had kneeled during demonstrations in an effort to de-escalate tensions, a move that later became politically contentious.
The dismissed agents filed a lawsuit in December 2025, alleging wrongful termination and claiming they were punished for perceived political views rather than misconduct. That case remains ongoing and adds another layer of complexity to the bureau’s personnel overhaul.
High-Level Departures Accelerate
The shakeup reached the highest levels of the FBI last summer. In August 2025, Brian Driscoll, the former acting FBI director, departed after resisting earlier directives from incoming leadership. On the same day, Steven Jensen, the assistant director of the Washington field office, was fired.
Jensen had overseen domestic terrorism investigations in the aftermath of January 6, placing him at the center of one of the bureau’s most controversial operational periods. His removal underscored the extent to which Patel was willing to reshape leadership connected to that chapter.
Other agents, including Walter Giardina — who worked on cases involving Trump and former adviser Peter Navarro — were also forced out around that time.
Scope of the Shakeup
Estimates suggest that at least a dozen agents were dismissed in the most recent wave alone, adding to dozens more removals throughout 2025. While the FBI has declined to publish a comprehensive list of names or dates, citing personnel privacy, the cumulative effect is clear: one of the most extensive internal restructurings in the bureau’s modern history.
Supporters of Patel argue the changes are necessary to restore public trust and address what they describe as politicization within federal law enforcement. Critics counter that the firings risk undermining institutional independence and morale.
FBI Remains Silent
The FBI has not issued a detailed public statement addressing the firings, beyond standard language noting that personnel decisions are internal matters. That silence has done little to quiet speculation, as lawmakers, former agents, and legal experts debate what the shakeup means for the future of the bureau.
What is clear is that Patel’s tenure has ushered in a decisive break from the past. As investigations tied to Trump continue to reverberate through Washington, the FBI itself is undergoing a transformation that may reshape its culture, leadership, and public perception for years to come.
Whether the changes ultimately strengthen the agency or deepen partisan divisions remains an open question — but the era of continuity at the FBI appears to be over.