NOTE: VIDEO AT THE END OF ARTICLE
Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Obama of Orchestrating “Treasonous Conspiracy,” Refers Evidence to DOJ
In a stunning announcement that sent shockwaves through Washington, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard accused former President Barack Obama of orchestrating a multi-agency conspiracy to sabotage President Donald Trump—and confirmed that evidence has been formally referred to both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI for possible prosecution.
The rare and explosive briefing was held at the White House Wednesday morning, with reporters and aides visibly stunned by Gabbard’s blunt accusations. She did not mince words, asserting that “the evidence… directly point[s] to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.”
“A Treasonous Conspiracy” – Gabbard Pulls No Punches
When pressed on whether the Obama administration’s alleged actions rose to the level of treason, Gabbard declined to issue a legal determination. But she made her opinion clear:
“This was a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy designed to erode public trust and cripple the Trump presidency before it even began.”
The assessment centers on claims that Obama manipulated or pressured senior intelligence officials—including within the CIA, FBI, and DNI—to produce a politically biased narrative surrounding alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Gabbard stated that the criminal referral includes a dossier of communications, internal memos, and “chain-of-command irregularities” that allegedly show Obama was personally involved in ordering the intelligence campaign.
Trump Responds: “He’s Stone Cold Guilty”
Shortly after the briefing, President Donald J. Trump addressed the nation via Truth Social, claiming this was “vindication.”
“Barack Obama is stone cold guilty. He led the gang. This wasn’t just a hoax—it was treason.”
Trump called the referral “only the beginning” and urged the DOJ to act swiftly, stating that justice must be served “at the highest level.”
What’s in the Referral?
While full details remain classified, Gabbard confirmed that her office has provided:
-
Internal communication logs between White House staff and intelligence heads
-
Briefing transcripts
-
Documentation of alleged coordination with Democratic National Committee (DNC) operatives
-
Alleged directives from Obama himself to adjust or “massage” assessments to fit political narratives
Gabbard emphasized that this wasn’t a partisan stunt:
“This is not about revenge. It’s about national integrity. If we can’t hold our highest leaders accountable, we don’t have a Republic.”
Obama Camp Fires Back: “Bizarre” and “Desperate”
The response from Obama’s team was swift and scathing. A spokesperson for the former president called the allegations:
“Bizarre, unsubstantiated, and a desperate attempt to distract from the current administration’s failures.”
They denied any wrongdoing during Obama’s second term and pointed to multiple past investigations—including the Mueller Report and Senate Intelligence Committee findings—that found no evidence of intelligence manipulation by the White House.
Still, many Republicans argue those reports were limited in scope and heavily redacted.
National Reaction: Shock, Support, and Skepticism
The story instantly dominated news cycles, social media, and pressrooms across the country. Supporters of Gabbard and Trump praised the move as long-overdue accountability.
Critics, however, accused the administration of “election-cycle theater” aimed at energizing Trump’s base before the 2026 midterms.
Even some centrists expressed concern that politicizing intelligence agencies—even retroactively—could further erode public trust in national institutions.
Could Obama Be Charged?
While a criminal referral is not an indictment, it is a formal request that the DOJ and FBI open an investigation based on the evidence provided.
Legal analysts say the bar for treason is extremely high—requiring direct evidence of aiding enemies of the United States. However, abuse of power, conspiracy, or obstruction of justice could carry significant legal consequences.
Former DOJ prosecutor Brent Marshall told LifeZette:
“If the documents show deliberate falsification of intelligence reports or political coercion within federal agencies, that alone could be criminal—even if it doesn’t rise to treason.”
Why It Matters
This isn’t just a political fight—it’s a constitutional moment.
Tulsi Gabbard, once a Democrat herself and now serving in a powerful national security role, is placing herself at the center of what may become one of the most consequential investigations in modern history.
If her allegations are proven true, the implications would be staggering: a former U.S. president orchestrating an intelligence-led effort to sabotage the peaceful transfer of power.
And if the evidence doesn’t hold up? Critics warn that the move could damage faith in American institutions and set a precedent for politically motivated prosecutions.
What Happens Next?
The Department of Justice has acknowledged receipt of the criminal referral but has declined public comment as of this writing.
It is expected that Attorney General Jeffrey Clark will assign a special prosecutor to examine the materials. Meanwhile, calls are growing on Capitol Hill for open hearings and greater transparency.
Gabbard, for her part, says she’s not backing down:
“The American people deserve truth. And they deserve justice—no matter how high the office or how powerful the person.”
