Russia responds angrily after US seizes Russian‑flagged tanker bound for Venezuela

Tensions between Washington and Moscow escalated sharply this week after U.S. forces seized an oil tanker linked to Russia as part of an aggressive maritime blockade aimed at isolating Venezuela. The incident has drawn fierce criticism from Russian officials, who accuse the United States of violating international law and engaging in what they describe as piracy on the high seas.

The vessel, identified as The Marinera, was intercepted after passing through a U.S.-enforced blockade designed to prevent sanctioned oil shipments connected to Venezuela. The operation is the latest development in a rapidly intensifying U.S. campaign against the South American nation, following a dramatic series of military and law enforcement actions that culminated in the detention of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

While the removal of Maduro has been praised by supporters of the Trump administration, critics across the international community argue that Washington’s actions represent an unprecedented breach of sovereignty carried out without authorization from the United Nations Security Council.

Russia Issues Formal Protest

Russia’s Transport Ministry responded swiftly to the seizure, releasing a sharply worded statement condemning the operation and asserting that the United States had no legal authority to stop the tanker.

According to the ministry, freedom of navigation on the high seas is protected under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The statement emphasized that no state has the right to use force against vessels lawfully registered under another country’s jurisdiction. Russian officials also revealed that communication with the tanker had been lost following the interception, raising concerns about the welfare of the crew.

The seizure has triggered growing anxiety in Moscow over the safety of Russian-linked shipping and the broader implications of U.S. enforcement actions beyond Venezuelan waters.

Accusations of Piracy

The diplomatic response was reinforced by prominent Russian lawmakers, including Senator Andrei Klishas, who publicly accused the United States of piracy. In a message posted on social media, Klishas argued that the tanker seizure followed what he described as a deadly U.S. “law enforcement operation” in Venezuela and represented a dangerous escalation.

He claimed the United States was abusing its military dominance to impose unilateral control over international shipping lanes, setting a precedent that could destabilize global maritime commerce.

Russia also called on Washington to ensure that the crew of The Marinera is treated humanely and returned home. However, U.S. officials have indicated that prosecution is likely, further inflaming tensions between the two nuclear powers.

U.S. Defends Seizure

The White House has rejected Russia’s accusations, defending the seizure as lawful and necessary. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the tanker was part of a Venezuelan “shadow fleet” used to transport sanctioned oil in violation of U.S. and international restrictions.

According to Leavitt, the vessel was deemed stateless after flying a false flag and was operating under a judicial seizure order issued by a U.S. federal court. Because of those findings, U.S. authorities argue that the interception was legal and that the crew is subject to prosecution.

U.S. officials maintain that the seizure was carried out to enforce sanctions designed to prevent oil revenues from financing what they describe as criminal and destabilizing activities linked to the former Venezuelan regime.

Second Tanker Seized

Compounding the situation, U.S. authorities announced the seizure of a second oil tanker, the M/T Sophia, which they described as a sanctioned “dark fleet” vessel operating in international waters in the Caribbean Sea.

Officials allege that the tanker was engaged in illicit activity connected to Venezuelan oil exports and had no legitimate national registry. The back-to-back seizures signal a significant expansion of U.S. enforcement efforts at sea and underscore Washington’s determination to choke off oil shipments tied to Venezuela.

The operations have raised alarms among global shipping companies and foreign governments concerned about the growing scope of U.S. maritime interdictions.

Maduro Detention and Broader Fallout

The tanker seizures come in the aftermath of the capture of Nicolás Maduro, who is currently in U.S. custody facing a sweeping list of charges. U.S. prosecutors accuse Maduro of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine trafficking, weapons offenses, and directing criminal organizations hostile to the United States.

The dramatic arrest followed U.S. military strikes on Caracas, actions that have been widely criticized as acts of aggression carried out without international approval. While some governments have remained silent, others have warned that the precedent could undermine global norms governing the use of force.

Venezuela’s immense oil wealth lies at the heart of the dispute. The country possesses the largest proven oil reserves in the world, and critics of U.S. policy argue that control over those resources is a central motivation behind Washington’s actions.

U.S. Plans for Venezuelan Oil

U.S. officials have openly discussed plans to control the sale and distribution of Venezuelan oil during the transitional period following Maduro’s removal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Venezuelan oil would be sold on the open market at standard rates rather than at steep discounts.

Rubio emphasized that proceeds from oil sales would be managed under U.S. oversight to prevent corruption and ensure funds are used for the benefit of the Venezuelan people. He argued that such controls are necessary to prevent a return to what he described as systemic theft under the previous regime.

Uncertain Path Forward

Despite Washington’s confidence, the future of Venezuela remains deeply uncertain. Reports suggest that the Trump administration has sidelined Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, raising questions about who will ultimately lead the country during the transition.

Rubio acknowledged that the situation remains fluid, stating that the United States currently holds significant leverage over interim authorities due to its control over oil exports. He emphasized that any long-term transformation would ultimately depend on the Venezuelan people, though U.S. permission would remain a key factor in determining whether oil shipments are allowed.

Rising Global Stakes

The seizure of The Marinera has transformed the Venezuelan crisis into a broader geopolitical confrontation, pulling Russia more directly into conflict with the United States. Analysts warn that continued enforcement actions against foreign-linked vessels risk provoking retaliation or miscalculation.

As Washington tightens its grip on Venezuelan oil and expands its maritime operations, the international community is watching closely. What began as a regional intervention now threatens to reshape global power dynamics at sea, with far-reaching consequences for international law, energy markets, and great-power relations.

Trump breaks silence after ICE agent shot woman in Minneapolis

Trump issues statement after ICE shooting in Minneapolis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *